Confirmed
A clear image or source shows the card face and stamped serial, with enough context for an admin to match the exact card and number.
Admin review standards
Strong discovery reports make new serialized card sightings easier to approve, easier to cite, and safer to share. Use this guide before submitting a find so the review queue gets the exact card, serial, source, and evidence context an admin needs.
A clear image or source shows the card face and stamped serial, with enough context for an admin to match the exact card and number.
A public marketplace, grading, social, article, or sale source identifies the serialized card, but the serial image or provenance may need extra review.
The report is useful as a lead, but the serial, image, source, or context is not strong enough to update public counts confidently.
Send the public listing or sold-comp URL, sale date when known, price if public, and screenshots only as supporting context.
Include the grading company page or cert lookup, visible grade/cert context, and the card name plus stamped serial.
Link the original post when possible. Reposts are weaker unless they preserve the original image, author, and date.
Use articles for provenance and discovery history, then add a direct source or image if the article does not show the stamp clearly.
Avoid private contact details. Share only the serial, price/date if allowed, and enough non-private context for admin review.
Pick the exact card and serial, then add a supported source link or upload a clear photo of the stamp. Either can be enough; both are welcome. Name, date, price and grading details are optional. Evidence stays private until safety checks and admin approval.
Only have notes? Submit the tip for review. A new serial cannot become located until supporting evidence is available. Notes about an already located copy can add context without raising its verification level.